Tuesday, April 28, 2026

The Threats to the Integrity of Higher Education in Indiana

 Harry Targ



For over two years now we have seen a brutal assault on the diversity of scholarship and education at Indiana University by a MAGA governor and state legislature. Although less visible the same efforts to destroy higher education are occurring at the other major Hoosier university, Purdue.

The state legislature passed laws that require annual reviews of professors to see that they include all perspectives in their teaching. Even tenured faculty, tenure a long-honored commitment to protect faculty from capricious attacks on their teaching and research, may be fired if they do not meet the criteria of “fairness and balance,” (which presumably would require faculty to present the pluses and minuses of Hitler’s Germany or the Spanish Inquisition). Legislation also requires these institutions to take complaints from students concerning their professors , often without providing proof or identifying themselves by name.

Indiana University

In addition, Indiana University which has been known for its multiplicity of language programs will shut them down if they do not have a sufficient number of majors. About 40 such language programs have been eliminated. Both universities have been encouraged to eliminate humanities programs, interdisciplinary programs, and programs that address diversity, equity, and identities.

https://www.ipm.org/news/2025-09-12/funding-cut-for-iu-programs-that-do-not-advance-american-interests-or-values

Universities have shifted their resources to artificial intelligence and collaboration with the military and large pharmaceutical companies. And generally, both universities are prioritizing so-called STEM education (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Legislators and university administrators claim that the only salient measure of university success is whether college graduates get jobs. (Ironically some data suggests that many STEM college graduates are not finding jobs and employers in the corporate sector are mostly interested in hiring graduates who write well, have analytical skills, and have a sensibility about the world outside the workplace).

All of these changes are occurring while both universities have acted in various ways to repress dissenting voices and acts that oppose policies of the national and state governments on race, gender, and support for US wars. At IU, for example, police with weapons were called to campus in response to protests of US support for Israel’s genocide against Palestinians.

Purdue University

Purdue University is a Big Ten university, a land grant institution and one of the two large and well known public universities in the state of Indiana (there are several public and private universities in the state). It has been known historically for strong programs in agriculture and engineering.  To its credit and largely because of the nationwide ferment in the 1960s  the university committed itself to create vibrant programs in other disciplines, many in the College of Liberal Arts.

Among the many programs developed over the last fifty years included a nationally recognized graduate program in American Studies, important programs, both undergraduate and graduate in African American and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, and programs of excellence in research and teaching in English, History, Sociology, Political Science, Communication, and Psychology, just to name a few. Even students who came to study engineering, computer science, agriculture, or business appreciated and enrolled in the many liberal arts courses mentioned above. Also every administration and faculty from the 1960s till quite recently recognized the inextricable connection between STEM related fields of specialization and a broad liberal arts education.

In addition, administrators, faculty, and students recognized that the history of the nation, the state, and even the university and its community had inadequately served minorities. Higher education was supposed to be accessible to students who historically had been denied such education because of their race, ethnicity, or gender. Former Purdue President Mitch Daniels said it well in a ceremony renaming two residence halls after African American students of the 1940s who had been denied access to housing:

“Purdue University and its land grant sisters around the country were put here more than a century ago to start lowering and removing barriers and promote the upward mobility of free peoples and that has been our history ever since,” Daniels said. “We’ve been too slow about it in many ways and many times, but the progress has always been forward.

Sometimes, it takes courageous and resolved people, like the Parker sisters, to push things further – and thank God they did.”

 https://www.purdue.edu/vpsl/news/perspectives-stories/fall-2021/parker-halls-monument-to-sisters.php

It All Changed on May 30, 2025.

 On this date Purdue University announced that all DEI programs would end. Offices were closed. Websites were taken down. Even the closure of DEI programs was announced at a retirement party for a DEI supervisor.

In addition, It was announced that the university would no longer be cooperating with the school newspaper, The Purdue Exponent. Although the Exponent was a non-university corporation, the university had provided spaces for distribution of the paper on campus and helped distribute the paper to those locations. The university indicated also that the newspaper should take the “Purdue” name off the logo of the newspaper.

Finally, shortly thereafter, it was announced that some 40 undergraduate and/or graduate programs with low enrollments, as defined by the Indiana legislature, would be cancelled. While these programs existed across the university a majority of them were in the liberal arts, including programs addressing substantive issues involving race, gender, and class.

Among the concerns raised by members of the faculty, students, and community have been the following:

1.The dismantling DEI programs

2.The justification for the unilateral, automatic, and unaccountable dismissals of workers in DEI programs. This is an issue of worker rights.

3.The lack of any input from the faculty and staff. Was the University Senate consulted at all? AAUP calls the norm for consultation "shared governance."

4.A seeming refusal to discuss the decisions or provide any information about them and their consequences.

5.The unilateral ending of formal ties with the Purdue Exponent at almost the same time that the announcement about DEI was made public.

6.And more recently the University Senate voted to censure the Provost for a variety of reasons relating to unilateral decisions and lack of consultation with faculty on educational matters such as the closing of the Honors College.

In sum, most faculty, students, staff, and members of the Greater Lafayette community and citizens of the state hope to see Purdue University return to its historic path of building a rich, diverse, educational experience for all

Conclusion

The state government, college administrators, and the federal government are seeking to roll back higher education to its historic role of training young people to serve the society as is and to socialize them to accept the legitimacy of government policies and US institutions. (Perhaps the most egregious of these policies is to reduce or eliminate coursework and research that address the undersides of US history such as the experiences of slavery and war).

Despite the press releases both universities circulate regularly, these universities are becoming shells of their former selves. They have embraced almost all the demands for change that have come from rightwing politicians, selected corporations, and the military. The rich diversity of the student body and the varieties of education that began to be developed in the 1960s and 1970s has disappeared as the curricula and university personnel reflect more the wishes of the state legislature and political appointees to the Boards of Trustees.

The Bookshelf

CHALLENGING LATE CAPITALISM by Harry R. Targ

Challenging Late Capitalism